翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ United States women's national lacrosse team ・ United States women's national rugby union team ・ United States women's national rugby union team (sevens) ・ United States women's national soccer team ・ United States women's national softball team ・ United States women's national squash team ・ United States women's national under-17 soccer team ・ United States women's national under-18 ice hockey team ・ United States women's national under-20 soccer team ・ United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians ・ United States v. Smith ・ United States v. Snider ・ United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. ・ United States v. Solon ・ United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n ・ United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. ・ United States v. Spearin ・ United States v. Sprague ・ United States v. Spy Factory, Inc. ・ United States v. Stanley ・ United States v. Steever ・ United States v. Stevens ・ United States v. Stewart ・ United States v. Stewart (1940) ・ United States v. Stewart (2003) ・ United States v. Stickrath ・ United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures ・ United States v. Sun Myung Moon ・ United States v. Swartz ・ United States v. Syufy Enterprises Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. ： ウィキペディア英語版 United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. (詳細は392 U.S. 157 (1968), is a case in the development of American administrative law. ==Legal principle== The scope of authority held by an agency is determined by the agency's organic statute. Where Congress grants an agency the power to maintain and regulate an area guided by the "public interest, convenience, or necessity," such a grant of power can include the regulation of areas not explicitly contemplated by the organic statute, as long as they are within the scope of the purpose of the original statute. Where agency action is necessary to fulfill the agency's ultimate goal, the Court may not prohibit such action. Note: The approach in this case takes a much more expansive approach than the earlier case of ''ICC v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Co.'' which provided for more limited powers for administrative agencies. Specifically, ''ICC'' held that regulative powers must be expressly granted by statute and not implied, while ''NBC v. US'', 319 U.S. 190 (1943), held that the issuance of regulations, though not expressly granted, are an acceptable way for the agency to fulfill its statutory obligations to serve the "public interest, convenience, or necessity." 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.